True Secrets of Freemasonry

Those who become Freemasons only for the sake of finding out the secret of the order, run a very great risk of growing old under the trowel without ever realizing their purpose. Yet there is a secret, but it is so inviolable that it has never been confided or whispered to anyone. Those who stop at the outward crust of things imagine that the secret consists in words, in signs, or that the main point of it is to be found only in reaching the highest degree. This is a mistaken view: the man who guesses the secret of Freemasonry, and to know it you must guess it, reaches that point only through long attendance in the lodges, through deep thinking, comparison, and deduction.

He would not trust that secret to his best friend in Freemasonry, because he is aware that if his friend has not found it out, he could not make any use of it after it had been whispered in his ear. No, he keeps his peace, and the secret remains a secret.

Giovanni Giacomo Casanova, Memoirs, Volume 2a, Paris, p. 33

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Of Masonic Regularity

No single issue is more divisive than that of the Regularity of a lodge. If you are a member of a regular Grand Lodge, you have millions of brothers around the world, and tens of thousands of lodges will open their doors to you. As a regular Mason, you know that your masonry can trace its roots back to the Premiere Grand Lodge of England and that you are heir to a rich heritage of Masonic history, tradition and learning.

Defining the Terms

Regular: Regularity is a constitutional mechanism whereby Grand Lodges or Grand Orients give one another mutual recognition. This recognition allows formal interaction at the Grand Lodge level, and gives individual Freemasons the opportunity to attend meetings at Lodges in other recognized jurisdictions.

Irregular: This is a description of practice. For instance, a regular lodge can confer a degree in an irregular manner: George Washington was raised as a master Mason before he was 21 years old, a practice that, at the time, was considered irregular. This does not change that he was a regular Mason.

Clandestine: A clandestine lodge is one that pretends to be Masonic but is without a warrant, dispensation, or charter from a regular/recognized grand lodge. Mackey (History of Freemasonry) states: “The (Anderson) Constitutions declare, Section 8, that where a number of Freemasons shall take upon themselves to form a Lodge without a Grand Master’s Warrant, the regular Lodges are not to countenance them nor own them are fair brethren, and duly formed. In other words, Lodge formed without a Warrant from the Grand Master (we now say Grand Lodge) is “clandestine,” and so a “clandestine Masons” is one made in a Lodge without a Warrant.”

Recognize: When One Grand Lodge recognizes another, it acknowledges its Masonic regularity, authority, and territorial integrity. Such recognition, in order to be effectual, must be mutual. When such a recognition is finally given by a more senior Grand Lodge to a Junior Grand Lodge, (it is always the Junior Grand Lodge that applies for recognition) the two Grand Lodges are said to be in amity, mutual intercourse, or fraternal relations. The processes whereby one Grand Lodge recognizes another often involve, and are sometimes preceded by a settlement of prior differences, if any. The most usual method of assessing the regularity of an unrecognized Grand Lodge petitioning for recognition involves the seeking out of the opinions of other Grand Lodges already recognized. (Henderson, op cit. p. 15)

Amity: Grand Lodges and Grand Orients that afford mutual recognition and allow intervisitation are said to be in amity. As far as the UGLE is concerned, regularity is predicated upon a number of landmarks, set down in the UGLE Constitution and the Constitutions of those Grand Lodges with which they are in amity. Even within this definition, there are some variations with the quantity and content of the Landmarks from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

There are two major branches of Freemasonry which consider their Lodges to be "regular", and both branches consider the other to be "irregular". The first, oldest and significantly largest of these two groups are those Grand Lodges in Amity with the United Grand Lodge of England. The other group are those Orients and Grand Lodges in amity with the Grand de France. The UGLE branch is commonly referred to as being "regular" (or "Mainstream") Masonry, while those Grand Lodges and Grand Orients in amity with GOdF are commonly referred to "liberal" or "irregular" Masonry.

For most regular, Mainstream Masons, there is little or no thought given to clandestine masonry, what it is, what it does, what it looks like, who are its members. They are not demonized to any extent, though they are not, for the most part, considered to be “real” masons. On the rare occasion that clandestine Masonry is considered at all, it is to ensure that the lodge you are visiting is in the Lodges Masonic publication, or, if you have met a brother on the street, to ensure his lodge is in that book before you invite him to your lodge for a degree.

So, Why Regularity?

Regularity is the tool we have devised to keep Masonry… well, Masonic. With anything in life, one must have a definition. In the case of Freemasonry, we have a definition of what is, and what isn’t, Masonic. In Freemasonry, what is Masonic is defined by the use of Regularity, recognition, and amity.

A Google search will show that there are many groups around the world that style themselves as Masonic, from outright frauds, such as the American Masonic Federation founded by Matthew McBlain Thomson upon the premise of selling degrees, to the United Grand Lodge of England, and hundreds of variations in between. Pretenders to masonry are groups like the Regular Grand Lodge of England, and the Grand Lodge of All England at York and of course, the American Masonic Federation noted above.

Yet, in between those extremes, the entirely irregular and clandestine to the very definition of regularity are orients, grand lodges and obediences that have as their members men, and yes, women, who name themselves Masons and brothers. What is a non Mason, no less a regular Mason to make of this spectrum of masonry that confronts them? How is one to decide, and does one need to decide?

We are told by irregular and clandestine Masons that the definition does not matter. Of course that is the position they would take, they must, or they would have to quit their group and join a regular lodge. At the other extreme you have the regular masons, who stand on the ground that the definition is essential, and they must take this position as well.

There are endless papers written on regularity, the Grand Lodges that participate in the system have committees and rules that define regularity. These seem to be pretty cut and dried things, but they aren’t, and therein lies the fault of the whole system. Of course, any system devised by man has faults.

In an earlier blog entry I wrote about the difference between regularity and recognition. In that article, my point was that, while the grand lodges and grand orients need to wrangle over the issue of regularity and amity and recognition, brothers, members of those orients, do not… as long as it does not entail Masonic communication.

Masonic communication, or as it is alternately called, Masonic intercourse, involves any type of communication involving sharing the secrets of masonry. Primarily, that is sitting in a tyled lodge session, which is any type of Masonic meeting where the general public is NOT allowed, or where the qualification for attendance is being a Mason.

For most Masons in the United States, regularity is not an issue. Rare is the case where you will meet a member of a non regular obedience in your travels. In other countries, for instance, in the United Kingdom or France, the probability rises that in your life you will meet at least one female Mason, or a man that is a member of a co-ed lodge. Try not to back away in horror if you do, as they are, for the most part, as is true with all regular masons, good brothers.

That is the rub, and the cause of much… hurt feelings. As a member of the Grand Lodge of California (just to reinforce, I am NOT speaking for the GLoCA here, only for ME), it is my understanding that I cannot hold Masonic intercourse with a clandestine Mason. My grand lodge does not recognize him/her as a Mason, however, on a personal level, its not about what the Grand Lodge does or says. Its about me, and the other Mason.

When I meet a Mason, it is not about whether they are regular. My first reaction is not to ask if they are a member of a regular grand lodge, that doesn’t even come up… unless they ask me to visit their lodge. THEN and only then, do I need to consider if I can do so legally and within my obligation.

Yet, brothers from lodges that are not recognized as regular do have a problem with the whole issue of regularity. Those in co-ed lodges are very interested in getting my grand lodge to recognize them and allow intervisitation, or at least allow the members to chose to attend a co-ed lodge. The question that has to be asked is: Why should the grand lodge do so?

The assumption being made, by the co-ed Mason, is that regular masons want to attend their sessions, that regular masons have an overwhelming curiosity about their sessions. The truth couldn’t be further from the truth, but it is hard to communicate that to our brethren in the co-ed obedience. The other, often unstated but clearly felt opinion by our brethren in the co-ed community is that the grand lodge fears them, that if they could somehow convince their regular brethren to visit that the regular brethren would be so smitten by what they see and experience that they would dimit and join the co-ed lodge on the spot.

This seems a pretty arrogant, though understandable conceit. The co-ed brethren are also, at least this has what has been communicated to me so often I assume it is true, of the opinion that many regular masons would leave the regular grand lodges if they just, somehow, knew that co-ed masonry existed in the world for them. Again, it’s an arrogant thing for them to feel, though as noted before, it is an understandable conceit.

As brothers, we can tie ourselves in knots over the regular/clandestine issue, or we can recognize that regularity is only a tool, one that has served the grand lodges and freemasonry well for almost 300 years. It is a tool for GRAND LODGES, however, and is not a tool of a master mason. We have other tools at our disposal, one of which is the level.

Let us, as brothers then, apply the Level to our non tyled meetings. If a person claims to be a Mason, let us, in the spirit of brotherly love, accept the claim on its face and grant them the respect they are due as masons. Leave the issues of regularity to the grand lodges to wrangle over.

May the blessings of heaven rest upon us and all regular masons, may brotherly love prevail, and evey moral and social virtue, cement us!

8 comments:

giovanni lombardo said...

A lodge (and also a Grand Lodge) is regular when it meets the following requirements:
1. it admits men only,
2. it works with the three greater lights...,
3. to the glory of GAOTU

Tom Accuosti said...

Bro. Theron, this is about the best and most concise explanation I've ever seen. Well written!

Eisbär said...

This is a most excellent post.

Related to the co-ed issue ... If we had better lodges and were having a blast in every lodge, would anyone worry someone might jump ship for co-ed lodges? Just a though about the importance of keeping what we do fresh and relevant.

Anonymous said...

Your assumptions on the feelings or motivations of Co-Masons do not equal my experiance at all. In fact, Co Masonic groups have co exsisted (alongside "rageular" mainstream Masonry)quite peacefully in major metro areas of the USA for quite some time. Take in CA for an example. George Washignton Union has been in San Francisco since the late 70's. They do not picket the GL of CA on California street. They are not screaming that anyone do anything. In fact, there are quite a few ragular attendees of the GWU who are also active in the GLoCA. Tough to believe? I know, the GL of CA would have one believe that to visit a Co-Masonic lodge is to create a whole in the time and space continumm, but thusfar it hasen't happend.
Co Masons are not looking for a takeover of the malecraft Atient Mainstream, nut they do think it would be nice if those in that system can come to grips that a Co Mason is in fact a MASON.
I also find the statement that you do not care or think about what others are doing because they are not recognized by your GL. That is really sad for you Brother, because you may be misisng out on a lot.
To the GOdF, they are just what they have been since 1733. The oldest GL in contenental Europe and the most traditional of Masonic bodies still in continuous exsistance. They are a wonderful group, doing wonderful work.

BC 2006

tim said...

I am often floored by the depth of posts that are beyond my skill of writing or of my knowledge.
This is when I humbly ask for permission (author and site noted) to use said posts of another to add to my newest blog endeavor.
Do I have that permission of you and yours, sir?

Theron Dunn said...

Brothers, anyone may use my words if you find them suitable for any masonic purpose as long as credit is given... thank you very much.

Bro.Geo said...

Brother Theron,

I have to agree. Nothing is more
divisive than the issue of
regularity. And I know you feel strongly about it. But it's a lot
like someone saying that chocolate
is the only legitimate flavor of ice cream.

So-called Regularity is based on
regular masons. After the Grand
Lodge of London was formed, regular
masons STILL created lodges outside
of its jurisdiction.

The Scottish lodges didn't have any
grand lodge and these lodges were
created by masons.

In 1751 the Most Ancient and
Honourable Grand Lodge created the
Antients, and I don't think you are
prepared to say that all of the
masons that joined and built that
Grand Lodge were not "regular"
masons.

The problem about "regularity" is
not really about origins. It's
about using it as a club to smash
attempts to break the monopolies
that American Grand Lodges have
invented for themselves. If the
Grand Lodges of Scotland, England
and Ireland can share jurisdictions
all over the world, then the
American grand lodges need to learn
that lesson too. Until the
monopoly is broken, grand lodges
will continue to go "rotten", and
once rotten they can stay that way.

For the sake of the craft new Grand
Lodges, created by regular masons
to further the craft, have to break
up the monopolies. The only way to
avoid this is to allow the 50
American grand lodges to enter each
other's territory. Until they are
willing to enter into such an
endeavor, it is only by new Grand
odges that the craft can be saved
from itself.

Fraternally and respectfully,

Brother George

If the Antients were real masons, then so too can new Grand Lodges be
created today for real freemasons!

dr.chioz sammy said...




WELCOME TO GREAT 666ILLUMINATIWORLDTEMPLE Are you a business man or an artist,Politicians and you want to become big,
Powerful and famous in the world, join us to become one of our official
member today.you shall be given an ideal chance to visit the Illuminati and
his representative after registrations is completed by you, no sacrifice,
or human life needed, Illuminati brotherhood brings along wealth and famous
in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away from your life
now. it only a member who is been initiated into the church of Illuminati
have the authority to bring any member to the church, so before you contact
any body you must be link by who is already a member, Join us today and
realize your dreams. we also help out our member in protection of drugs
pushing, once you become a member you will be rich and famous for the rest
of your life, Illuminati make there member happy so i will want you all to
also be a member of the Illuminati Thanks. contact this email on
666illuminatiworldtemple@gmail.com or you call +2348039370962 okay

 
/* Blog Catalog Code ----------------------------------------------- */ Philosophy Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory /* End Blog Catalog Code ----------------------------------------------- */