At this point, I would like to state that all masons should ACKNOWLEDGE each other as masons, men, women, co-masonic, regular, irregular, clandestine, whatever. If someone claims to be a mason, regardless of provenance, I plan on acknowledging them as a type of Mason. I won't invite them to lodge, or sit in lodge with them, because that is a matter of Masonic jurisprudence and my obligation.
How can we NOT acknowledge a man as a Mason when he makes the claim? What difference does it make to our obligation, and truth to tell, our obligation can be argued to REQUIRE us to acknowledge someone a mason just based on the claim. So while I cannot recognize a woman or a co-mason as a regular mason, I am firmly of the opinion that I can acknowledge these brothers and sisters as types of masons.
It seems the Masonic thing to do.
May the blessing of heaven rest upon us and all regular masons. May brother love prevail, and every moral and social virtue, cement us.
Well said Brother!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteExcellent perspective on a universal masonic philosophy,
ReplyDeletebrother!
Bro. Tom Coste
Halcyon
PS: should easy to implement, no?
A superb clarification and great addition to your earlier blog!
ReplyDeleteShortly after I was raised in Alabama, I was told by brothers that should a black Mason walk up to me and extend his hand in a Masonic manner that I was to walk away and not acknowledge him. I have instead chosen to extend the hand of friendship to all Masons, irregardless of obedience, race, or gender. I have to say that even though most Masons still plays the recognition game, admiting to the fact that other types of Masons do exist is a step in the right direction.
ReplyDeleteSincerely,
Masked Mason
Yes very well said Brother!!!
ReplyDeleteI feel better now :)
ReplyDeleteBC 2006